-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: dependency error #659
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a significant expansion of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #659 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 71.00% 71.00%
=======================================
Files 189 189
Lines 11804 11804
=======================================
Hits 8381 8381
Misses 2854 2854
Partials 569 569 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
foundation/application.go (1)
Line range hint
1-314
: Summary of changes and recommendation for comprehensive testingThe changes in this file appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to restructure packages and update type references. The main changes include:
- Updating the import path for the console contract.
- Changing the embedded type in the
Application
struct fromfoundation.Container
to*Container
.- Updating method signatures to use the new
contractsconsole.Command
type.While these changes are consistent within this file, it's crucial to ensure they are applied consistently across the entire codebase. The shift to pointer-based embedding for the Container in the Application struct may have wider implications on how the struct is used and initialized.
Given the nature of these changes, I strongly recommend:
- Conducting a thorough review of all files that import or use the affected packages and types.
- Updating and running all existing unit and integration tests to ensure no regressions.
- Adding new tests specifically to cover the changes in behavior resulting from the pointer-based embedding of Container.
- Performing a full end-to-end test of the application to catch any runtime issues that may not be apparent in static analysis.
These steps will help ensure that the refactoring has been applied consistently and hasn't introduced any unintended side effects or breaking changes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- contracts/foundation/application.go (2 hunks)
- contracts/foundation/container.go (0 hunks)
- contracts/foundation/service_provider_test.go (0 hunks)
- foundation/application.go (5 hunks)
- foundation/application_test.go (18 hunks)
- foundation/container.go (7 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- contracts/foundation/container.go
- contracts/foundation/service_provider_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (20)
foundation/application.go (3)
41-41
: Verify implications of changing embedded type to pointerThe embedded type in the
Application
struct has been changed fromfoundation.Container
to*Container
. This shifts from composition to pointer-based embedding.This change could have implications on how methods are called and how the struct behaves. Please ensure that:
- All places where
Application
is instantiated properly initialize theContainer
pointer.- There are no nil pointer dereferences introduced by this change.
Run the following script to identify potential issues:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify potential issues with the Container pointer usage # Test 1: Find Application struct instantiations echo "Checking Application struct instantiations:" rg --type go 'Application\s*\{[^}]*\}' # Test 2: Look for potential nil checks on Container echo "Checking for nil checks on Container:" rg --type go 'if\s+app\.Container\s*==\s*nil' # Test 3: Identify direct Container method calls echo "Identifying direct Container method calls:" rg --type go 'app\.Container\.[A-Za-z]+'Review the results to ensure proper initialization and usage of the
Container
pointer.
212-212
: Verify consistency of registerCommands method signature changeThe method signature for
registerCommands
has been updated to usecontractsconsole.Command
instead ofconsolecontract.Command
, which is consistent with the import statement update and theCommands
method signature change.To ensure this change is applied consistently and doesn't break any existing code, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of the old method signature and verify the new one is used correctly # Test 1: Search for any remaining instances of the old method signature echo "Checking for any remaining instances of the old method signature:" rg --type go 'func\s+\([^)]+\)\s+registerCommands\s*\(\s*commands\s+\[\]consolecontract\.Command\s*\)' # Test 2: Verify the new method signature is used correctly echo "Verifying the new method signature is used correctly:" rg --type go 'func\s+\([^)]+\)\s+registerCommands\s*\(\s*commands\s+\[\]contractsconsole\.Command\s*\)' # Test 3: Check for any calls to the registerCommands method echo "Checking for calls to the registerCommands method:" rg --type go '\.registerCommands\s*\('Review the results to ensure that:
- There are no remaining instances of the old method signature.
- The new method signature is used correctly wherever it's defined.
- All calls to the
registerCommands
method use the correct type for thecommands
parameter.
64-64
: Verify consistency of Commands method signature changeThe method signature for
Commands
has been updated to usecontractsconsole.Command
instead ofconsolecontract.Command
, which is consistent with the import statement update.To ensure this change is applied consistently and doesn't break any existing code, please run the following script:
Review the results to ensure that:
- There are no remaining instances of the old method signature.
- The new method signature is used correctly wherever it's defined.
- All calls to the
Commands
method use the correct type for thecommands
parameter.foundation/container.go (3)
12-35
: Improved import organization and consistencyThe changes to the import statements enhance the code's readability and maintainability:
- Consistent naming convention: All contract-related imports now use the "contracts" prefix, making it easier to identify and manage these imports.
- Reduced potential for naming conflicts: The use of more specific import aliases (e.g.,
contractsauth
instead ofauthcontract
) decreases the likelihood of naming conflicts with other packages.- Addition of
frameworklog
import: This change helps to avoid potential naming conflicts with the standardlog
package.These modifications align with best practices for import organization in large Go projects.
Also applies to: 43-43
69-73
: Consistent method signature updatesThe method signatures have been updated to reflect the new import alias naming convention. These changes are consistent across all methods and align with the modifications made to the import statements. The updates include:
- Parameter types (e.g.,
contractshttp.Context
instead ofhttpcontract.Context
)- Return types (e.g.,
contractsauth.Auth
instead ofauthcontract.Auth
)- Function parameter types in the
make
methodThese changes maintain the existing functionality while improving code consistency. The updates have been applied uniformly across all relevant methods, reducing the potential for errors and improving maintainability.
Also applies to: 85-92, 95-104, 107-114, 117-124, 127-134, 137-144, 147-154, 157-164, 167-174, 177-186, 189-196, 199-206, 209-216, 219-226, 229-236, 239-246, 249-256, 259-266, 269-276, 279-286, 289-296, 299-306, 309-316, 319-327, 334-336, 353-363
Line range hint
1-374
: Summary of changes and their impactThe modifications in this file are focused on improving code organization and consistency without altering the core functionality of the
Container
struct. The key changes include:
- Renaming import aliases for better clarity and reduced potential for naming conflicts.
- Updating method signatures to reflect the new import alias naming convention.
These changes contribute to:
- Enhanced readability: Consistent naming makes the code easier to understand and navigate.
- Improved maintainability: Standardized import aliases reduce cognitive load when working with different parts of the codebase.
- Reduced error potential: Consistent naming across the file minimizes the risk of mistakes due to naming inconsistencies.
Overall, these changes represent a positive refactoring effort that aligns with Go best practices for large projects.
foundation/application_test.go (12)
27-33
: LGTM: Consistent renaming of mock package importsThe import statements for mock packages have been consistently updated to follow the new naming convention (
mocks<package>
instead of<package>mocks
). This change appears to be part of a project-wide restructuring of mock packages and should not affect the functionality of the tests.
160-160
: LGTM: Consistent mock package updates in TestMakeAuthThe mock package names have been correctly updated in the TestMakeAuth function to match the new import naming convention. These changes are consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
Also applies to: 163-163
183-183
: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeCacheThe mock log package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeCache function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
217-217
: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeEventThe mock queue package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeEvent function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
235-235
: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeGrpcThe mock config package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeGrpc function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
272-272
: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeLangThe mock log package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeLang function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
292-292
: LGTM: Consistent mock package updates in TestMakeMailThe mock config and queue package names have been correctly updated in the TestMakeMail function to match the new import naming convention. These changes are consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
Also applies to: 295-295
315-315
: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeOrmThe mock config package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeOrm function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
348-348
: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeQueueThe mock config package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeQueue function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
371-371
: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeRouteThe mock route package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeRoute function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
388-388
: LGTM: Consistent mock package updates in TestMakeScheduleThe mock console and log package names have been correctly updated in the TestMakeSchedule function to match the new import naming convention. These changes are consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.
Also applies to: 391-391
Line range hint
1-444
: Summary: Consistent renaming of mock packages throughout the fileThe changes in this file are part of a larger refactoring effort to standardize mock package naming across the project. All mock package references have been updated from
<package>mocks
tomocks<package>
. This change has been consistently applied to import statements and throughout all test functions.Key points:
- The changes are purely syntactical and do not affect the functionality of the tests.
- The consistency of the changes suggests they were likely applied systematically, possibly through automated refactoring.
- All test functions remain structurally unchanged, maintaining their original behavior.
These changes improve code consistency and should make it easier to manage mock packages in the future. No further actions are required for this file.
contracts/foundation/application.go (2)
79-79
: Inconsistent method signatures forMakeAuth
andMakeLang
The methods
MakeAuth(ctx http.Context)
(line 79) andMakeLang(ctx context.Context)
(line 95) accept a context parameter, whereas otherMake
methods do not require parameters. This inconsistency might lead to confusion for the interface users. Verify if the context parameter is necessary for these methods and, if so, consider providing additional documentation or refactoring to maintain consistent method signatures.Also applies to: 95-95
78-127
: Consistent naming enhances code readabilityAll
Make
methods follow a consistent naming convention and structure, which improves code readability and maintainability. This consistency is beneficial for developers interacting with the interface.
Conflicts |
Solved |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
📑 Description
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
Container
interface, streamlining dependency management.