Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: dependency error #659

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2024
Merged

fix: dependency error #659

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl commented Sep 29, 2024

📑 Description

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Expanded service management capabilities with new methods for creating various service instances (e.g., authentication, caching, logging).
    • Introduced methods for binding and registering shared instances.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved clarity and consistency in import aliases for contract interfaces.
  • Chores

    • Removed the Container interface, streamlining dependency management.
    • Updated mock variable references in test files for better naming consistency.
    • Deleted outdated test file related to service provider functionality.

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2024 14:25
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve a significant expansion of the Application interface in the contracts/foundation/application.go file, introducing numerous methods for managing various service instances. The Container interface has been removed, and import statements have been updated for consistency. Additionally, mock variable references in the test files have been renamed for clarity, while a test file for a service provider has been deleted.

Changes

Files Change Summary
contracts/foundation/application.go Expanded Application interface with new methods for service management; updated import statements and method signatures.
contracts/foundation/container.go Removed Container interface; updated method signatures to reflect new import aliases.
foundation/application_test.go Renamed mock variable references for clarity; no structural changes to tests.
foundation/service_provider_test.go Deleted file containing tests for a service provider.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • kkumar-gcc

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4393423 and b0bf34c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • foundation/application_test.go (18 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • foundation/application_test.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.70175% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.00%. Comparing base (9b03192) to head (b0bf34c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
foundation/container.go 85.18% 8 Missing ⚠️
foundation/application.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #659   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.00%   71.00%           
=======================================
  Files         189      189           
  Lines       11804    11804           
=======================================
  Hits         8381     8381           
  Misses       2854     2854           
  Partials      569      569           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
foundation/application.go (1)

Line range hint 1-314: Summary of changes and recommendation for comprehensive testing

The changes in this file appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to restructure packages and update type references. The main changes include:

  1. Updating the import path for the console contract.
  2. Changing the embedded type in the Application struct from foundation.Container to *Container.
  3. Updating method signatures to use the new contractsconsole.Command type.

While these changes are consistent within this file, it's crucial to ensure they are applied consistently across the entire codebase. The shift to pointer-based embedding for the Container in the Application struct may have wider implications on how the struct is used and initialized.

Given the nature of these changes, I strongly recommend:

  1. Conducting a thorough review of all files that import or use the affected packages and types.
  2. Updating and running all existing unit and integration tests to ensure no regressions.
  3. Adding new tests specifically to cover the changes in behavior resulting from the pointer-based embedding of Container.
  4. Performing a full end-to-end test of the application to catch any runtime issues that may not be apparent in static analysis.

These steps will help ensure that the refactoring has been applied consistently and hasn't introduced any unintended side effects or breaking changes.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d23da62 and 4393423.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • contracts/foundation/application.go (2 hunks)
  • contracts/foundation/container.go (0 hunks)
  • contracts/foundation/service_provider_test.go (0 hunks)
  • foundation/application.go (5 hunks)
  • foundation/application_test.go (18 hunks)
  • foundation/container.go (7 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • contracts/foundation/container.go
  • contracts/foundation/service_provider_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (20)
foundation/application.go (3)

41-41: Verify implications of changing embedded type to pointer

The embedded type in the Application struct has been changed from foundation.Container to *Container. This shifts from composition to pointer-based embedding.

This change could have implications on how methods are called and how the struct behaves. Please ensure that:

  1. All places where Application is instantiated properly initialize the Container pointer.
  2. There are no nil pointer dereferences introduced by this change.

Run the following script to identify potential issues:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify potential issues with the Container pointer usage

# Test 1: Find Application struct instantiations
echo "Checking Application struct instantiations:"
rg --type go 'Application\s*\{[^}]*\}'

# Test 2: Look for potential nil checks on Container
echo "Checking for nil checks on Container:"
rg --type go 'if\s+app\.Container\s*==\s*nil'

# Test 3: Identify direct Container method calls
echo "Identifying direct Container method calls:"
rg --type go 'app\.Container\.[A-Za-z]+'

Review the results to ensure proper initialization and usage of the Container pointer.


212-212: Verify consistency of registerCommands method signature change

The method signature for registerCommands has been updated to use contractsconsole.Command instead of consolecontract.Command, which is consistent with the import statement update and the Commands method signature change.

To ensure this change is applied consistently and doesn't break any existing code, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of the old method signature and verify the new one is used correctly

# Test 1: Search for any remaining instances of the old method signature
echo "Checking for any remaining instances of the old method signature:"
rg --type go 'func\s+\([^)]+\)\s+registerCommands\s*\(\s*commands\s+\[\]consolecontract\.Command\s*\)'

# Test 2: Verify the new method signature is used correctly
echo "Verifying the new method signature is used correctly:"
rg --type go 'func\s+\([^)]+\)\s+registerCommands\s*\(\s*commands\s+\[\]contractsconsole\.Command\s*\)'

# Test 3: Check for any calls to the registerCommands method
echo "Checking for calls to the registerCommands method:"
rg --type go '\.registerCommands\s*\('

Review the results to ensure that:

  1. There are no remaining instances of the old method signature.
  2. The new method signature is used correctly wherever it's defined.
  3. All calls to the registerCommands method use the correct type for the commands parameter.

64-64: Verify consistency of Commands method signature change

The method signature for Commands has been updated to use contractsconsole.Command instead of consolecontract.Command, which is consistent with the import statement update.

To ensure this change is applied consistently and doesn't break any existing code, please run the following script:

Review the results to ensure that:

  1. There are no remaining instances of the old method signature.
  2. The new method signature is used correctly wherever it's defined.
  3. All calls to the Commands method use the correct type for the commands parameter.
foundation/container.go (3)

12-35: Improved import organization and consistency

The changes to the import statements enhance the code's readability and maintainability:

  1. Consistent naming convention: All contract-related imports now use the "contracts" prefix, making it easier to identify and manage these imports.
  2. Reduced potential for naming conflicts: The use of more specific import aliases (e.g., contractsauth instead of authcontract) decreases the likelihood of naming conflicts with other packages.
  3. Addition of frameworklog import: This change helps to avoid potential naming conflicts with the standard log package.

These modifications align with best practices for import organization in large Go projects.

Also applies to: 43-43


69-73: Consistent method signature updates

The method signatures have been updated to reflect the new import alias naming convention. These changes are consistent across all methods and align with the modifications made to the import statements. The updates include:

  1. Parameter types (e.g., contractshttp.Context instead of httpcontract.Context)
  2. Return types (e.g., contractsauth.Auth instead of authcontract.Auth)
  3. Function parameter types in the make method

These changes maintain the existing functionality while improving code consistency. The updates have been applied uniformly across all relevant methods, reducing the potential for errors and improving maintainability.

Also applies to: 85-92, 95-104, 107-114, 117-124, 127-134, 137-144, 147-154, 157-164, 167-174, 177-186, 189-196, 199-206, 209-216, 219-226, 229-236, 239-246, 249-256, 259-266, 269-276, 279-286, 289-296, 299-306, 309-316, 319-327, 334-336, 353-363


Line range hint 1-374: Summary of changes and their impact

The modifications in this file are focused on improving code organization and consistency without altering the core functionality of the Container struct. The key changes include:

  1. Renaming import aliases for better clarity and reduced potential for naming conflicts.
  2. Updating method signatures to reflect the new import alias naming convention.

These changes contribute to:

  • Enhanced readability: Consistent naming makes the code easier to understand and navigate.
  • Improved maintainability: Standardized import aliases reduce cognitive load when working with different parts of the codebase.
  • Reduced error potential: Consistent naming across the file minimizes the risk of mistakes due to naming inconsistencies.

Overall, these changes represent a positive refactoring effort that aligns with Go best practices for large projects.

foundation/application_test.go (12)

27-33: LGTM: Consistent renaming of mock package imports

The import statements for mock packages have been consistently updated to follow the new naming convention (mocks<package> instead of <package>mocks). This change appears to be part of a project-wide restructuring of mock packages and should not affect the functionality of the tests.


160-160: LGTM: Consistent mock package updates in TestMakeAuth

The mock package names have been correctly updated in the TestMakeAuth function to match the new import naming convention. These changes are consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.

Also applies to: 163-163


183-183: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeCache

The mock log package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeCache function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.


217-217: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeEvent

The mock queue package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeEvent function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.


235-235: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeGrpc

The mock config package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeGrpc function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.


272-272: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeLang

The mock log package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeLang function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.


292-292: LGTM: Consistent mock package updates in TestMakeMail

The mock config and queue package names have been correctly updated in the TestMakeMail function to match the new import naming convention. These changes are consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.

Also applies to: 295-295


315-315: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeOrm

The mock config package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeOrm function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.


348-348: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeQueue

The mock config package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeQueue function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.


371-371: LGTM: Consistent mock package update in TestMakeRoute

The mock route package name has been correctly updated in the TestMakeRoute function to match the new import naming convention. This change is consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.


388-388: LGTM: Consistent mock package updates in TestMakeSchedule

The mock console and log package names have been correctly updated in the TestMakeSchedule function to match the new import naming convention. These changes are consistent with the earlier import statement updates and should not affect the test's functionality.

Also applies to: 391-391


Line range hint 1-444: Summary: Consistent renaming of mock packages throughout the file

The changes in this file are part of a larger refactoring effort to standardize mock package naming across the project. All mock package references have been updated from <package>mocks to mocks<package>. This change has been consistently applied to import statements and throughout all test functions.

Key points:

  1. The changes are purely syntactical and do not affect the functionality of the tests.
  2. The consistency of the changes suggests they were likely applied systematically, possibly through automated refactoring.
  3. All test functions remain structurally unchanged, maintaining their original behavior.

These changes improve code consistency and should make it easier to manage mock packages in the future. No further actions are required for this file.

contracts/foundation/application.go (2)

79-79: Inconsistent method signatures for MakeAuth and MakeLang

The methods MakeAuth(ctx http.Context) (line 79) and MakeLang(ctx context.Context) (line 95) accept a context parameter, whereas other Make methods do not require parameters. This inconsistency might lead to confusion for the interface users. Verify if the context parameter is necessary for these methods and, if so, consider providing additional documentation or refactoring to maintain consistent method signatures.

Also applies to: 95-95


78-127: Consistent naming enhances code readability

All Make methods follow a consistent naming convention and structure, which improves code readability and maintainability. This consistency is beneficial for developers interacting with the interface.

foundation/application.go Show resolved Hide resolved
contracts/foundation/application.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@kkumar-gcc
Copy link
Member

Conflicts

@hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

hwbrzzl commented Sep 29, 2024

Solved

Copy link
Member

@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl merged commit 52b284c into master Sep 29, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl deleted the bowen/fix-container-error branch September 29, 2024 15:01
This was referenced Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants